LEVYdance
presents
“AMP – Coasts
Collide with LEVYdance and Sidra Bell Dance New York”
ODC Theater,
San Francisco
November 15,
2012
As a critic, I
hate characterizing any performance as ‘interesting’; it is such a blank
statement. But, interesting is really
the only word I have to describe “AMP”, a shared modern dance program between
LEVYdance and Sidra Bell Dance New York.
All of the dancers from both companies did a superb job; however, the
choreography itself was a very mixed bag.
Benjamin Levy presented two beautiful contemporary works which bookended
two unsuccessful avant-garde pieces by Sidra Bell.
The program
opened with a short pas de deux - “Falling After Too” (2003), choreography by
Benjamin Levy and Darrin Michael Wright; piano composition and live
accompaniment by Anthony Porter.
Porter’s score for this work was very reminiscent of Debussy, which immediately
brought to mind the nature of Impressionistic music. Debussy and his peers came on the scene as the Romantic era came
to a close and the 20th Century composers were on the rise. In this short, ambiguous period,
conventions and characteristics were porous, flexible and changing. Levy and Wright’s duet spoke to a
similar fluidity. Were the dancers
moving on their own or being manipulated by each other; were they making
individual decisions or reacting to each other’s choices; was it a combination
of all of these possibilities?
“Falling After Too” was wonderfully and deliciously unclear.
I like dance
theater just fine. It might not be
my favorite genre, but when it is done well - à la Bausch, Goode and Forsythe -
I completely appreciate it. Sidra
Bell’s “less” (for LEVYdance) and “Nudity” (for her own company) were just
not good dance theater. “less”
featured a contorted, grotesque, tribal, animalistic movement vocabulary
accompanied by a soundscape of amplified noise. Sequences of crawling and stalking were interspersed with
command/obey segments in which one dancer yelled instructions at the
others. Absurdity is a common
theatrical tool in dance theater, yet, in good dance theater, the absurdity has
a place, a reason and an intention.
Here, we were witnessing absurdity for its own sake, which comes across
as nothing but self-indulgent. The
huge false eyelashes, futuristic make-up and blaring floorlights made “less” feel
like an assault on the senses. One
saving grace was that the movement style was certainly different for the
LEVYdance performers and it is always good to see a company venture outside
their comfort zone.
Following
intermission, the dancers of Sidra Bell Dance New York took the stage in “Nudity”. The beginning of the piece felt like
‘more of the same’, except that this time the performers were costumed in black
rather than the white from “less”.
However, the dance did change and evolve differently. Though the physical language had
similarities, snippets of ballet were infused throughout (changement, allongé,
balloné, attitude turns, developpé à la second and 5th position of
the feet). The ballet was a
welcome addition, though Bell’s point (no pun intended) was that ballet is
stifling; ballet is bad. This message
was received loud and clear in the first three minutes so I’m not sure why the
piece was so long. The most
shocking part of “Nudity” were the two instances where the dancers
ventured into the audience, whispering in people’s ears, clutching their faces,
and touching their shoulders. Right
now, notions of discomfort coupled with a desire to breakdown the boundaries
between performer and viewer are super trendy in modern dance. But you can still examine these issues
without having your dancers actually touch people. I witnessed audience members recoiling and getting angry due
to the invasion of their personal space.
To be fair, I must also admit that from the resounding chorus of bravos
as the lights dimmed, at least half of the audience clearly loved Bell’s work. “less” and “Nudity” were not for
me, but they obviously spoke deeply to others.
The last piece
on “AMP’s” bill was Levy’s 2008 work, “Physics”. After close to an hour of the bizarre, I was overjoyed to
see his choreography reclaim the stage.
A quartet, this contemporary work explored points of contact, some
familiar and conventional, others not: finger/chin, hand/clavicle, heel/lower
back, arm/waist, palms, wrists.
The piece questioned what is built from these initial physical meetings:
what grows from them; what energy do they have; what affection may be present;
what promises are contained; what possibilities exist and what resentment lies
in wait. It was gorgeous.
LEVYdance Photo: David DeSilva |
Last week, I
complained about some logistical issues at another ODC Theater event. So I must also mention that in between Thursday
night’s performance and the Q-and-A with the artists, audience members who
weren’t wanting to participate were afforded a few minutes to depart. Much
appreciated.
No comments:
Post a Comment